Transform Government Tender Evaluation with AI
Read hundreds of complex bids in minutes. Compliance is computed in code, every mark belongs to a named evaluator, and financial envelopes stay sealed until technical scores are locked.
The Status Quo is Costing You
Traditional evaluation methods are manual, slow, and prone to error.
Hundreds of documents
Sifting through thousands of pages across multiple bids is physically exhausting.
Manual compliance
Missing a single mandatory document leads to legal disputes and re-tendering.
Lengthy evaluations
Technical reviews take months, delaying critical national infrastructure projects.
Inconsistent scoring
Subjective bias among different reviewers leads to unfair award recommendations.
Audit challenges
Difficulty in tracing the rationale behind every point awarded during audits.
AI-Powered Precision Workflow
Upload & Ingest
Securely upload tender and bid documents in any format (PDF, Excel, Docx).
AI Extraction
RAG-powered analysis extracts key technical specs, financial figures, and compliance clauses.
Compute, then confirm
Numeric, date and yes/no criteria are decided by comparison in code. Qualitative marks are recorded by named evaluators, blind first.
Enterprise Features for Institutional Precision
AI Proposal Analysis
Advanced LLMs read through 500+ page proposals to cross-verify claims against technical specifications automatically.
Compliance Matrix
Mandatory documents mapped across every bidder — never marked missing while a file is still unmatched.
Blind-first scoring
Each member records their own mark before any AI second opinion is revealed. Both are retained, and the deference rate is reported.
Variance, surfaced
Where members disagree beyond the threshold the mean does not stand. The chair records an agreed mark and the reason for it.
Committee Workspace
A unified dashboard for the technical committee to review, comment, and finalize scores.
Built for Indian Institutional Security
Sealed bids, actually sealed
Prices are unreachable until technical lock — enforced by the database policy, the API and a test. Single-tenant deployment available.
Explainable AI (XAI)
Most verdicts are not model output at all — they are comparisons in code. Where AI contributes, it cites the page it read.
Human-in-the-loop
AI suggests, humans decide. Final approval authority always rests with the committee.
Sector-Specific Evaluation Intelligence
Defense
Railways
Smart Cities
Healthcare
Frequently Asked Questions
Does AI replace the Evaluation Committee? expand_more
No. Our AI acts as a "Senior Technical Analyst" that performs all the heavy lifting—reading thousands of pages, checking compliance, and drafting scores. The final decision and score approval always remain with the human committee members.
How are scores generated? expand_more
Each member scores independently. Only once their own mark is recorded is an AI second opinion revealed, with the passage it relied on — they may keep their mark or amend it, and both are retained. Responsiveness, qualification and rank are computed in code, with no model in the path.
Is it compliant with GFR and Indian Procurement Rules? expand_more
Yes. The platform is designed specifically to mirror the processes outlined in the General Financial Rules (GFR) and the Manual for Procurement of Goods/Services. It ensures every step is documented for CAG audits.
Make Tender Evaluation Faster, Fairer and Fully Transparent
Bring a tender you have already concluded and see whether the software reaches your committee's conclusion — and whether it can show you why.